Call 0404 878 676

Swept Path Analysis

The item NSW councils most often send back. Included in CTMPs prepared to TS 05492:1.0 TCAWS.

Redacted traffic management plan sample
Sample vehicle path layout — site name redacted

Why do reviewers reject plans without this?

They need proof the largest vehicle can enter, turn and leave without hitting a kerb, parked car or opposing lane. This applies to NSW councils and TCCS.

What vehicle should we design for?

Use the largest vehicle you actually need. In denser NSW LGAs that is often a 12.5 m Heavy Rigid Vehicle. The Dee Why plant demobilisation used a 19 m semi-trailer path. ACT sites should use the vehicle named in the TCCS condition.

Can you add this to an existing plan that was rejected?

Yes. Send the RFI comments and the current plan. In many cases the missing swept paths are the only reason it has not been approved.

How do I get a quote?

Call 0404 878 676 or send the suburb (NSW or ACT), access point and vehicle type.

Is swept path analysis still the main NSW rejection reason?

Yes. NSW councils repeatedly ask for it on CTMPs. It is also used in ACT TMPs when TCCS wants proof of the largest vehicle path.

Google Reviews

What clients say

★★★★★

“Always fast and efficient with their responses, any question or issue gets handled quickly and professionally. Reliable partner overall, and I recommend them whenever I can.”

Pedro Henrique Gomes Tolentino · Google

Call 0404 878 676 Request Quote